Link to NPM website
Banner image of Railway Mail Service

Interior of Railway Post Office car, cir. 1890
Interior of Railway Post Office car, cir. 1890
Interior of Railway Post Office car, cir. 1890

Danger on the Rail

Fires

At the inception of the Railway Mail Service and prior to that, train cars were made primarily of wood. This was problematic and caused huge risk of fires. This issue was even more imminent for the Railway Post Office cars, which were located directly behind the locomotive and tender and were therefore very susceptible to fire. The mail car was placed there in order to protect the passenger cars that were further behind the RPO.(1) If a spark from the engine flew back toward the mail car, fire could break out. The biggest causes of fires in RPO cars were their oil lamps or wooden stoves being upset in a wreck or quick stop, tossing fire into what was nothing less than kindling all over the car. This was hard to avoid though, some thought, easy to prevent. As the problem grew, many advocated for steel cars, in hopes that fewer lives—and less mail—would be lost. Not only was steel less likely to catch fire, it was also much stronger and was less likely to damaged in a wreck.





    This table shows the immense growth in the use of steel for construction of mail cars. Courtesy of the National Postal Museum Library, Smithsonian Institution Libraries  

In 1853, a train carrying mail in a freight car caught fire in the night, en route west from New York. There was scarcely any mail to speak of after the blaze, which incinerated many business documents, including invoices, drafts, and acceptances. Because of the speed of the train, shouts to the engineer warning of the fire were made in vain. The wind caused by the train also fanned the flame, causing massive destruction before the fire was noticed by the brakeman.(2)

Other such instances helped push railroad companies into building steel cars. Suggestions were made to shift to some kind of fireproof material in car construction.(3) Although the most commonly suggested material was steel, some suggested fireproof wood. The argument was made that, “a mail car with the floor and framing built up of channel-iron and angles, and with sides and roof of sheet steel, would not only be proof against absolute loss by collision, but would of course be completely fireproof.” (4) By 1922, 53.9% of cars had steel underframes or were made entirely of steel.(5) Even though steel was undoubtedly safer than wood, railroad companies, which owned the actual cars, continued to produce and use wooden cars because it was less expensive than shifting to a fireproof alternative.(6)





  Listen to Robert Hammond tell the story of a fire on one of his trips:  
  Robert Hammond mp3 link to audio pdf link to transcript  

1) Nancy Pope, “Braving the Mails: U.S. Railway Mail Clerks from 1890-1905” NPC Newsletter,/1 no. 3 (October-December, 1989) 19-36. National Philatelic Collection, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution.

2) The New York Daily News, October 6, 1853, p. 8.

3) Scientific American, May 31, 1902, Vol. LXXXVI, No. 22 p 376.

4) Ibid.

5) Annual Report of the PMG 1922.

6) Pope, 19-36.

Back to topBack to TopHome | Copyright | Privacy | Contact | Site Map | Smithsonian Institution